They choose what they want to host, and can delete whatever videos they choose whenever they want. It means that they are not a public forum and are allowed to determine which content appears on their platform. The court did not rule on whether they are responsible for third-party content, just whether YouTube violated constitutional rights by restricting it. Let’s try this on the sidewalk you can stand and shout whatever you want but if you come into my restaurant or onto my front porch I have the right to boot you out if you piss me off because those spaces though open to the public to one degree or another are privately owned. we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. They quashed all the competition by sharing ad revenue with creators.
TRENDING PRODUCT